Fatih Şahin Фатіх Шахін Ukraine, business and international experience — since 2004
Reconstruction & Recovery

Turkish contractors and Ukrainian reconstruction

Turkish construction firms are among the most experienced in the world at building in difficult places. What they can offer Ukraine is specific, and so are the conditions they will need.

Novodnistrovsky quarry
Photo: Yevheniia Soldatenko · CC BY 4.0

I write about this with an obvious interest, so let me be plain about the analysis rather than the advocacy.

What the sector actually brings

Turkish contractors have spent four decades working in markets that Western firms found too difficult: post-conflict, post-earthquake, high-inflation, currency-unstable, weak-supply-chain environments. That produces a specific competence — the ability to price a project honestly under uncertainty and still deliver it.

Practical strengths: speed on infrastructure, willingness to mobilise a workforce and site accommodation quickly, and long experience of building where materials must be imported because local production is disrupted.

Geography matters too. The Black Sea is a short logistics route, and short routes matter enormously when the cost of a project is dominated by moving heavy material.

What the sector must accept

European procurement rules, in full. Reconstruction financed by European instruments will be tendered under European procedure, with European transparency, environmental and labour standards. A firm that treats compliance as an obstacle will not qualify. A firm that treats it as a competitive discipline will find that many competitors cannot meet it either.

Local partnership, genuinely rather than nominally. Ukrainian firms know the regulations, the ground conditions and the labour market. The successful structures will be joint ventures where both parties contribute something real.

The condition that decides everything

Insurance. Almost no contractor can mobilise plant and people into a war-risk zone without war-risk cover, and commercial markets will not write it alone. The public insurance mechanisms being built for exactly this purpose are, in practice, the gate through which reconstruction contracting passes.

My honest view

Reconstruction should not be treated as a market to be captured. It is a country being rebuilt for the people who live in it. Firms that arrive with that understanding will do well over twenty years. Firms that arrive to extract a margin will be found out quickly, and rightly.

I should say that I am not a neutral observer here: I am one of the people doing business between these two countries. That is exactly why I say it — what will work for Turkish contracting in Ukraine is its speed and its habit of building in difficult places, and what will not is the reflex that everything can be sorted out later. Here the specification is taken seriously, and it should stay that way.

Related reading

Comments

If you have something to add, please do. Comments are read and approved before they appear.

Published after approval.