Fatih Şahin Фатіх Шахін Ukraine, business and international experience — since 2004
Society & Regions

Charitable giving and where it goes

Domestic philanthropy here operates at a scale and speed that would be remarkable anywhere, and it runs largely on payment apps and personal reputation.

Escalator in Kiev, Ukraine
Photo: Juanedc from Zaragoza, España · CC BY 2.0

The volume of money raised domestically for charitable purposes here is very large relative to income levels, and the mechanism by which it moves is worth describing because it is unusual.

How it actually works

Mostly through payment applications and card transfers, in small amounts, from a great many people, to funds and individuals with public reputations.

A named person or organisation announces a target and a purpose, publishes the account, and the target is met — frequently within hours. Then, and this is the part that makes it function, they publish the receipts: what was bought, from whom, at what price, with photographs of the delivery.

Why the reporting matters more than the regulation

The system runs on reputation rather than on formal oversight. A fund that does not publish its accounting stops receiving money quickly, because donors compare and talk.

That is a genuinely effective accountability mechanism, and it is faster than any regulator. It is also fragile in the way reputation systems are, and there have been failures.

What it funds

Medical equipment and treatment, humanitarian supply for displaced people, rebuilding of houses and schools, equipment for services, and support for animals — which is a larger category than outsiders expect.

The corporate side

Companies give substantially, and increasingly they publish what they gave. Employee matching schemes are common and payroll giving has become normal in larger firms.

The observation worth making

A society that raises this much from this many people, this quickly, with this level of published accounting, has built a civic institution. It happens to have been built out of payment apps rather than foundations, and it works.

That reporting matters more than regulation is the same mechanism trust runs on in commerce: people are trusted not because they are supervised but because they account for themselves. We apply the same rule to our own company giving — we do not give through a channel that does not publish where it went. What is worth noting is that this speed is something no institution can imitate.

Related reading

Comments

If you have something to add, please do. Comments are read and approved before they appear.

Published after approval.