Fatih Şahin Фатіх Шахін Ukraine, business and international experience — since 2004
Trade & Investment

Standards convergence, from a machinery supplier view

Ukraine replaced a Soviet standards system with European standards. For a machinery supplier that removed a genuine barrier and created a period of confusion.

Grand&Great (27)
Photo: Sergento · CC BY-SA 3.0

Standards are the least discussed trade barrier and frequently the most effective one. Ukraine spent a decade replacing an inherited system with the European one, and the practical consequences for an equipment supplier are worth setting out.

What the old system was

A body of inherited standards, prescriptive in form: they specified how a thing should be made rather than what it had to achieve.

A prescriptive standard is a barrier by construction. Equipment designed to a different but equally safe approach fails it, not because it is unsafe but because it is different.

What replaced it

Adoption of European standards as national standards, with the corresponding inherited ones withdrawn. The new standards are performance-based: they state the outcome required and leave the method to the designer.

That change alone opened the market to any manufacturer already building to European norms, which is most of them.

The confusion in between

For several years both systems coexisted, and a supplier could encounter a customer, an inspector or a tender specification still referring to a withdrawn standard.

The practical answer was to supply the European declaration and the reference showing which national standard it corresponds to, and to expect to explain it.

What a supplier should hold

The declaration of conformity, the technical file, the test reports and a translation of the operating documentation into the state language, which is a legal requirement for equipment placed on the market.

The remaining work

Market surveillance and the accredited testing base, which are the parts of the system that make a declaration mean something. A standard nobody verifies is a document rather than a control.

I lived this change directly: while the old norms applied, bringing a European-built machine in here was a paper war; today the declaration of conformity and the technical file are enough. What remains is market surveillance — because a declaration nobody verifies ends up no different from the paperwork of the old system.

Related reading

Comments

If you have something to add, please do. Comments are read and approved before they appear.

Published after approval.