Independence Day 2021: thirty years, measured honestly
Three decades of independence, a land market that finally opened in July, an energy price shock building in Europe, and a military build-up on the border that most analysts are still describing as pressure rather than preparation.
Thirty years. Yesterday Kyiv hosted the founding summit of the Crimea Platform; today there is a full military parade on Khreshchatyk for the first time in three years. The symbolism is deliberate and the timing is not accidental.
An honest thirty-year assessment has to hold several things at once, so let us take them in order.
What three decades produced
Ukraine is a middle-income country with a market economy, a competitive electoral system in which incumbents regularly lose, a free press, and an export sector integrated into world markets. It has changed government through elections seven times and through street protest twice. Its currency is convertible for current account purposes, its central bank has been genuinely independent for most of the past six years, and its banking system is smaller, cleaner and better supervised than at any point in its history.
It is also poorer per head than every EU member state, poorer than Belarus by some measures, and has lost roughly ten million people since 1991 to emigration, mortality and territorial loss. Its GDP per capita is roughly where it was in 1990 in real terms, which is a sentence that should be uncomfortable to write on a thirtieth anniversary.
The gap between the first paragraph and the second is the whole story, and it has one main explanation: for most of these thirty years, the returns to political connection exceeded the returns to productive investment. Every structural feature of the Ukrainian economy follows from that single fact.
The land market opened in July
Since 1 July, Ukrainian citizens have been able to buy agricultural land, up to one hundred hectares. The first seven weeks show transaction volumes well below the alarmist forecasts and prices settling around a fifth to a tenth of comparable EU farmland — roughly one to two thousand dollars a hectare depending on region and quality.
That price gap is the investment case and the political problem simultaneously. It reflects the buyer restrictions, the absence of mortgage finance at scale, and a security discount that has widened this year. It will close, and whoever holds land while it closes captures the difference. That is precisely why the restrictions exist.
The energy shock nobody is pricing
European gas prices have roughly tripled since spring and are still rising. Storage across the EU is unusually low going into winter. For Ukraine this cuts three ways at once: higher import costs for the gas it still buys, higher transit relevance and revenue, and a domestic tariff problem in an economy where household energy prices are politically load-bearing.
Industrial consequences arrive first. Ukrainian ammonia and fertiliser plants, which run on gas, are already curtailing output — the same dynamic as 2006 but at a larger multiple. Any manufacturer with gas in its cost base should be modelling a winter at prices several times the level assumed in this year's budget.
The thing on the border
There has been a substantial military build-up near Ukraine's borders since the spring. It receded partially in June and is being reconstituted. The mainstream reading, in Kyiv and in most European capitals, is coercive signalling connected to Nord Stream 2 and to the stalled Minsk process.
This archive is not in the business of military forecasting and will not pretend to certainty. What can be said commercially is narrower and still useful. Any operation in Ukraine should now have a written answer to four questions: where are your people if borders close, where is your data if a site becomes inaccessible, which of your contracts have a force majeure definition broad enough to cover armed conflict, and how much cash can you access outside the country within seventy-two hours.
Those are cheap questions to answer in August. Firms that answered them this autumn were materially better placed six months later than firms that did not.
Thirty years in
The honest summary of three decades is that Ukraine built a society that is far more European than its institutions and an economy that is far more capable than its governance. Every year that gap persists costs measurable output and measurable population.
The country has never had a better external framework for closing it — an association agreement, a free trade area, an open land market, and the highest level of Western political attention in its history. Whether that is enough is the question the next decade answers.
Related in this archive
Share this analysis
Comments