Fatih Şahin Фатіх Шахін Ukraine, business and international experience — since 2004
Economy & Macro

The diaspora as an investor, not just a sender

Ukrainians abroad send money home in enormous volumes and invest at home in very small ones. Closing that gap is a policy question with a large prize.

Kinoteatr maiak
Photo: Parnikoza · CC BY-SA 4.0

Ukrainians abroad transfer very large sums home each year. Almost none of it becomes investment. That gap is not inevitable and several countries have closed it deliberately.

Why remittances do not become capital

Because they are sent to a household, not to a project. A person abroad supporting a mother's pension is not making an allocation decision; they are meeting an obligation.

And because the instruments do not exist. A Ukrainian in Warsaw who wanted to put savings into a Ukrainian business would face a currency question, a legal question, a governance question and no obvious product. Most people, facing that, buy a flat instead — which is investment of a kind but the least productive kind available.

What has worked elsewhere

Diaspora bonds: government or municipal debt sold specifically to nationals abroad, often at below-market yields because the buyer accepts a lower return for a connection to home. Several countries have raised substantial sums this way.

Investment funds with diaspora participation, professionally managed, so an individual does not have to underwrite a single business.

Matching schemes for small business investment in a home region, which are common in migration-heavy countries and are usually run at municipal level.

What it requires

Instruments a person can buy in ten minutes from another country, in a currency they hold, with disclosure they can read in a language they use. That is a product design problem more than a policy problem.

Why it matters now

Reconstruction needs private capital, and there are several million people with a personal reason to supply it who are currently not being asked properly.

The gap between the person sending a remittance and the person investing is not trust but instruments: the first needs a phone, the second needs a lawyer, an accountant and a local partner. Finding those three took me months in my own set-ups — for somebody abroad it is close to impossible. What would close this gap is not an incentive but a ready-made structure.

Related reading

Comments

If you have something to add, please do. Comments are read and approved before they appear.

Published after approval.