Fatih Şahin Фатіх Шахін Ukraine, business and international experience — since 2004
EU & Euro-Atlantic Integration

Agriculture: the hardest chapter

Ukraine is a very large agricultural producer joining a union whose agricultural policy is its most politically defended. That is the central difficulty of the whole accession.

Виставка Київавтодору, 2018 10 24,
Photo: kyivcity.gov.ua · CC BY 4.0

Of all the negotiating chapters, agriculture is the one where the arithmetic itself is the problem, and it is worth stating plainly rather than diplomatically.

Why it is difficult

Ukraine has an enormous arable area, competitive production costs and a farm structure dominated by very large operations. The common agricultural policy distributes support largely by area farmed.

Apply the existing rules unchanged to a member of Ukraine's size and the budget arithmetic does not work: either the common budget grows substantially, or payments to existing recipients fall. Neither is politically simple, and both have to be discussed by governments answerable to their own farmers.

The market side

Producers in several member states are direct competitors of Ukrainian producers in grain, oilseed, poultry and sugar. The friction that appeared over overland grain transit was a preview of a much larger conversation, and it was handled imperfectly.

The likely shape of a solution

Long transition periods, phased introduction of direct payments over many years, safeguard mechanisms for specific sensitive products, and — probably — a reform of the policy itself before or alongside enlargement.

Every previous enlargement involving significant agricultural producers was resolved this way. It is slow and it is not humiliating; it is how the Union has always done this.

What I would say to both sides

To Ukrainian producers: the transition will be long and the requirements will be real, and complaining about them will not shorten either.

To existing members: an agricultural producer of this scale inside the Union is a strategic asset in a world where food security has become an explicit policy concern. The adjustment is expensive; the alternative is worse.

What I would say to both sides is the same: this chapter is not a question of principle but of a transition schedule. Ukraine's scale is an undeniable fact and the European producer's concern is legitimate; what is negotiable between them is pace. That is how it is resolved in trade too — quotas and phased opening work better than good intentions.

Related reading

Comments

If you have something to add, please do. Comments are read and approved before they appear.

Published after approval.