Fatih Şahin Фатіх Шахін Ukraine, business and international experience — since 2004
Politics & Governance

Open data as public infrastructure

Ukraine publishes an unusual amount of state data openly. The value of that is not transparency in the abstract; it is what specific people do with specific datasets.

Independence Square, Maidan Nezalezhnosti, Kiev (29826698668)
Photo: Andrew Milligan sumo · CC BY 2.0

Ukraine publishes state data at a level unusual anywhere: company ownership, public procurement, budget spending, property registers, court decisions, asset declarations and infrastructure data are all open.

Why this is infrastructure rather than transparency

Because transparency describes an attitude and infrastructure describes something people build on. Open procurement data allowed independent analytics that identify suspicious tenders automatically. Open company data allowed journalists to trace ownership chains. Open court decisions allowed lawyers to see how a provision is actually applied.

Each of those is a service that exists because a dataset exists, and none of them was built by the state.

The anti-corruption effect

Direct and demonstrable. A procurement official who knows every tender is machine-readable and monitored behaves differently, and this effect operates without any enforcement action at all.

It is also cheap. Publishing a dataset costs a fraction of an inspectorate.

The risks, which are real

Personal data exposure, where a register designed for one purpose reveals more than intended about individuals. And, since 2022, security: detailed public infrastructure data is useful to more than researchers, and some datasets were quite properly restricted.

The correct response to both is targeted restriction with a stated reason and a review date, not a general retreat from openness.

The lesson

Open a dataset and something gets built on it that nobody planned. That is the argument for opening data, and it cannot be made in advance because the applications are not predictable — which is exactly why open data policies are so often refused.

What makes open data infrastructure rather than abstract transparency is that specific people use it, and I am one of them. Without the tender record, the company register and the land data I could not do business. The risks are real — personal data and misuse; but the answer is not closing it, it is choosing correctly which fields are open.

Related reading

Comments

If you have something to add, please do. Comments are read and approved before they appear.

Published after approval.