Building to European standards from the start
A building designed to Eurocodes is accession-ready, insurable, financeable and comprehensible to a foreign contractor. One designed to the old norms is none of those.
Every building put up during reconstruction will stand for fifty years. Which design code it is built to is therefore a decision with a fifty-year consequence, and it is being taken now, project by project.
What Eurocodes are
The European structural design standards: loads, concrete, steel, timber, masonry, geotechnical design and seismic design, as a consistent set.
They are performance-based, so they state what a structure must withstand and leave the designer to demonstrate it, in contrast to prescriptive norms that specify dimensions.
Why it matters practically
A foreign engineer can check a Eurocode design; they cannot readily check a design to unfamiliar national norms, and a project financed internationally requires an independent design review.
An insurer prices a structure designed to a recognised code differently from one they cannot assess.
And a contractor from outside the country can bid on a Eurocode design without redesigning it, which widens the field and lowers the price.
The product side
Construction products — cement, steel, insulation, windows, structural components — carry a declaration of performance under the harmonised standard. A designer specifying to Eurocodes needs products declared to the corresponding standard, so design alignment pulls product alignment with it.
The transition problem
Two systems in use simultaneously, engineers trained on one designing under the other, and a shortage of people who can do both. That is a training question and it is the actual constraint.
The argument
Building to the standard you will be required to meet, before you are required to meet it, costs nothing extra and avoids rebuilding the compliance later.
For a structure designed to Eurocodes I can obtain quotations from Europe; for one designed to the old norms I cannot. The difference is not engineering but access: bids come in whichever language the specification speaks. Building to European standards from the start is both cheaper and faster than harmonising afterwards — and it multiplies the pool of suppliers.
Share this analysis
Comments