Orchestras, films and the argument they make without arguing
Ukrainian musicians and filmmakers have spent four years touring, and the effect of that work is different in kind from anything a spokesperson can achieve.
Among the more effective forms of support in this period has been the simplest: inviting Ukrainian performers to play and Ukrainian films to be shown.
What touring achieves
An orchestra performing a Ukrainian composer in a European concert hall is making an argument that no press release makes: that this is a musical culture with its own repertoire, its own composers and its own history, and that it belongs on the same stage.
Audiences who could not name a Ukrainian composer before hearing one now can. That is a small change in a large number of individual heads, and it accumulates.
Film
Co-production arrangements with European funds, festival slots, and support for documentary work which has been the most active form. Documentary is cheap, fast and unanswerable, and Ukrainian documentary of this period is being made by people filming their own streets.
What is being funded alongside
Residencies for artists who cannot work at home, instrument replacement for music schools that lost theirs, and support for institutions rather than only individuals — because an orchestra that dissolves does not reassemble.
The observation
Cultural work is often treated as the decorative part of a support programme. It is the part that changes how people feel about a country, and feelings decide what governments can do.
Share this analysis
Comments