Reform assessed in public, twice a year
By mid-2023 Ukraine had entered a rhythm that most candidate countries find uncomfortable: a published external assessment of what has and has not been done.
Through 2023 the European Commission assessed Ukraine's progress against its recommendations periodically and published the results. That process deserves more attention than it gets, because the publication is the mechanism.
Why publishing changes behaviour
A private assessment can be argued with, softened, or delayed. A published one becomes a domestic political fact within hours: opposition parties quote it, journalists compare it to the previous version, and civil society organisations build campaigns on the items marked incomplete.
The government then has to answer questions at home about a document written abroad. That is uncomfortable, and the discomfort is precisely what produces movement.
What the mid-2023 picture looked like
Some recommendations substantially met — judicial governance bodies restarted, anti-corruption leadership appointed through competition, media legislation passed. Others partly met, with legislation adopted but implementation untested. Others outstanding.
That mixed result is what an honest assessment looks like. A uniformly positive report would have been worth nothing to anyone.
The thing worth noticing
Ukraine accepted this scrutiny voluntarily, while at war, in a period when it had every available excuse to ask for it to be suspended. It did not ask.
A government that agrees to be publicly marked during a war is telling you something about where it intends to end up.
Share this analysis
Comments