London: the conference that talked to investors, not only donors
The recovery conference in London in June 2023 did something the earlier ones had not. It addressed private capital directly, and it spent most of its time on the single question private capital asks: who carries the risk?
Lugano set the principles. London, a year later, asked the harder question: where does the money actually come from?
Public financing cannot rebuild a country of this size. The arithmetic does not work, and everyone in the room knew it. So the conference in June 2023 addressed private capital directly — and private capital has exactly one question. Not whether the opportunity is attractive. Whether someone will carry the risk if a facility is destroyed.
The instruments that were discussed
War risk insurance, sovereign and multilateral guarantees, political risk cover from development finance institutions, first-loss tranches that let a commercial lender sit behind a public one. Not glamorous, and precisely the plumbing that determines whether a factory gets financed.
I was interested in this as a practical matter. I have signed contracts here that a European bank would not finance because it could not price the risk. The whole reconstruction question, for a private company, reduces to whether that pricing problem is solved. London was the moment the conversation admitted it.
Share this analysis
Comments