Ukraine Annual Review 2008: two economies in one year
The first half was an overheating boom with inflation above thirty percent. The second was one of the sharpest contractions in Europe. Nothing structural changed in between; only an external price did.
The year in one paragraph
Ukraine spent the first half of 2008 with an economy running beyond capacity and inflation above thirty percent, joined the WTO in May, watched global steel prices halve and international funding markets close in the third quarter, and ended the year with a forty percent devaluation, a quarter of its industrial output gone, and an emergency IMF programme.
The four quarters
Q1 — overheating; inflation at a decade high; no policy instrument in use.
Q2 — WTO accession, the most durable positive development of the decade; commodity prices peak.
Q3 — steel collapses, funding markets close, the transmission begins.
Q4 — devaluation, output collapse, bank resolution, IMF programme.
What actually happened
An economy structured around one export commodity, funded by short-term external borrowing, with household debt in a currency its borrowers did not earn, met a global repricing of risk.
Every element of the severity was domestic. The timing was entirely external.
That distinction matters because it separates what a country controls from what it does not. Ukraine could not have prevented the global crisis. It could have entered the crisis with a floating exchange rate, restrictions on unhedged foreign-currency lending and a banking sector funded domestically — and had it done so, 2009 would have been a recession rather than a collapse.
The one durable gain
WTO accession, completed in May, was worth more over the following fifteen years than the recession cost. Bound tariffs, dispute settlement access and the precondition for the EU agreement all date from this year.
Structural improvement and cyclical catastrophe genuinely can happen in the same twelve months, and the archive is clearer about this than contemporary commentary was.
What carried into 2009
A banking system with severe asset quality problems and no resolution framework adequate to the scale. A presidential election campaign. An unresolved gas pricing dispute heading toward another January interruption. Industrial capacity idled with uncertain prospects of restart. And an IMF programme whose conditions the political system could not deliver in an election year.
The commercial reading
The single most transferable finding of 2008 is about currency structure.
Businesses whose revenue currency matched their debt currency came through. Businesses that had taken cheaper foreign-currency debt against domestic revenue did not, regardless of how well they were run.
That was not a sophisticated insight in 2008 and it is not one now. It was simply ignored because the cheaper rate was visible every month and the risk was visible only once.
Related in this archive
Share this analysis
Comments