Ukraine Annual Review 2014: the year everything deferred came due
A change of government, a floated currency, a lost region, an armed conflict, a signed trade agreement and a broken energy dependency — all within twelve months, and most of them the delayed resolution of questions open since 2010.
The year in one paragraph
Ukraine changed government in February, abandoned the fixed exchange rate it had defended since 2008, lost Crimea to russian occupation in March, faced the war russia started in its industrial east from April, signed the economic chapters of the EU association agreement in June, lost eastern gas supply the same month and covered the winter without it, held a parliamentary election in October, and closed the year with the deepest output contraction since 2009.
The four quarters
Q1 — change of government; currency floated; Crimea annexed.
Q2 — IMF programme, EU agreement signed, gas supply halted, conflict begins.
Q3 — industrial collapse in the affected regions; corporate relocation westward.
Q4 — election; heating season covered without eastern gas; severe contraction.
What actually resolved
Three questions that had been open for years were settled in this single year, and none of them by choice.
The exchange rate. Deferred since 2011, resolved in February by the exhaustion of reserves.
The trade orientation. Deferred since 2011, resolved in June by signature.
The energy dependency. Deferred since 2006 and specifically postponed by the 2010 discount, resolved in June by a supply halt.
This is the central lesson of the archive stated in its harshest form. Every one of these adjustments was available on better terms in an earlier year. Each was deferred because the immediate political cost was visible and the deferred cost was not. All three then arrived in the same twelve months, in the worst possible circumstances, and had to be absorbed simultaneously.
What was permanently lost and gained
Lost: a region, a substantial share of heavy industrial capacity, the coal supply chain feeding the power system, and the pre-2014 industrial geography.
Gained: a floating exchange rate, a signed EU trade framework, an energy supply route that did not depend on a single counterparty, and an economy whose growing sectors were now the mobile ones.
The commercial reading
For a company, 2014 is the year that answers the question of what an accumulation of deferred adjustments actually costs.
The answer is that they do not disappear. They queue, and they arrive together, at the moment when the country has the least capacity to absorb them.
The same test applies to any business. An adjustment postponed because conditions are difficult does not become easier — it becomes an item in a queue that empties all at once during the next crisis.
Related in this archive
Share this analysis
Comments