Ukraine Market Report — Q4 2004
A disputed election, mass protest, a repeat vote and a change of government inside eight weeks. The commercial system absorbed all of it without a payments failure, which was the quarter's most important finding.
Overview
The quarter contained a disputed presidential election, weeks of mass protest in central Kyiv, a court-ordered repeat vote and a change of administration. It also contained no bank failure, no payments system interruption and no default.
Both halves of that description matter, and the second half is the one that tends to be forgotten.
Macro position
The hryvnia came under sustained pressure through late November and December. The central bank defended the fixed rate with reserves and administrative measures, and the rate held.
Deposit outflows accelerated sharply during the disputed period. Households withdrew, converted to dollars and held cash. Several banks faced acute liquidity pressure and were supported.
Reserves fell materially from their pre-crisis level. That was the cost of the defence, and it was affordable precisely because the export boom had built the reserve position over the preceding three quarters.
Sectors
Retail and services — a visible demand pause in November and December, concentrated in discretionary categories. Food and essentials were unaffected.
Metals and agriculture — export operations continued without interruption. Ports worked, rail worked, contracts were performed. The export economy and the political crisis occupied the same country and barely touched.
Construction — projects paused. Very few were cancelled.
Banking — the sector that took the strain, and the sector where the weaknesses visible earlier in the year became consequences.
What the quarter settled
Three things worth carrying forward.
First, that Ukrainian commercial infrastructure is more robust under political stress than the political coverage suggests. Contracts were performed and goods moved throughout.
Second, that the banking system was the transmission channel for political risk, and that its capital and governance weaknesses were the country's real vulnerability rather than the politics itself.
Third, that the export sector is substantially insulated from domestic political events, because its customers, its prices and its logistics are all external.
For a company deciding whether to enter or expand, the useful distinction was between a business dependent on domestic sentiment and one dependent on external demand. The first had a difficult quarter; the second barely noticed.
Related in this archive
Share this analysis
Comments