Getting private capital into reconstruction
Public money and development bank lending will not cover the bill. Private capital will come only where the risk is shared and the revenue is identifiable.
Every estimate of the reconstruction bill exceeds what grants and concessional lending can plausibly provide. The gap has to be filled by private capital, and private capital has requirements that have to be met rather than appealed to.
What private capital needs
An identifiable revenue stream. An investor funds a toll road, a port terminal, a power plant, a housing development or a factory. They do not fund a school, because a school does not generate revenue.
That distinction sorts the reconstruction programme into two piles immediately, and the private pile is smaller than the announcements imply.
Risk they can price and transfer: political risk cover, war risk cover, and a legal structure whose enforcement they believe in.
And a return commensurate with the risk, which will be higher than in a stable market and should be stated rather than negotiated down through optimism.
The structures that work
First-loss tranches, where public or donor money absorbs the initial losses so private capital sits in a senior position it can accept.
Guarantees covering specific risks rather than the whole investment.
And co-investment alongside a development bank, whose presence provides both diligence and a degree of protection.
What does not work
Asking private investors to accept public-sector returns for private-sector risk, which is what most appeals amount to.
The realistic conclusion
Private capital funds the revenue-generating part of reconstruction and public money funds the rest. Designing the programme around that division from the start produces more investment than treating every project as potentially private.
Private capital does not avoid risk; it avoids risk it cannot measure. The rule is the same in my own investments: if I can price the uncertainty I go in, and if I cannot I stay out however attractive it looks. The way to draw private money into reconstruction is not to raise the return but to make the risk definable — insurance, guarantee and a predictable revenue.
Share this analysis
Comments